4112 - وَ رَوَى فَضَالَةُ عَنْ أَبَانٍ عَنْ رَجُلٍ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اَللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ اَلسَّلاَمُ قَالَ : سَأَلْتُهُ كَيْفَ يَكُونُ اَلرَّهْنُ بِمَا فِيهِ إِنْ كَانَ حَيَوَاناً أَوْ دَابَّةً أَوْ فِضَّةً أَوْ مَتَاعاً فَأَصَابَهُ حَرِيقٌ أَوْ لُصُوصٌ فَهَلَكَ مَالُهُ أَوْ نَقَصَ مَتَاعُهُ وَ لَيْسَ لَهُ عَلَى مُصِيبَتِهِ بَيِّنَةٌ قَالَ "إِذَا ذَهَبَ مَتَاعُهُ كُلُّهُ فَلَمْ يُوجَدْ لَهُ شَيْءٌ فَلاَ شَيْءَ عَلَيْهِ" قَالَ "وَ إِنْ قَالَ ذَهَبَ مِنْ بَيْنِ مَالِي وَ لَهُ مَالٌ فَلاَ يُصَدَّقُ".
Hadith.4112 - Fadalah narrated from Aban, who narrated from a man, that Abu Abdillah 
was asked:
"How does the collateral (rahn) remain valid in cases where it is an animal, a mount, silver, or goods, and it gets destroyed due to fire or theft, causing the owner's loss or a decrease in its value, and there is no evidence to support the claim of loss?"
Imam said: "If all of his goods are completely destroyed and nothing remains, then there is nothing (no liability) upon him."
Imam further said: "However, if he claims that the loss occurred from among his possessions while he still possesses other property, he will not be believed."
