<p class='libAr' dir='rtl'>فالوجه في هذه الاخبار وما شاكلها أن نقول: يموت ذكره، ويعتقد أكثر الناس أنه بلي عظامه، ثم يظهره الله كما أظهر صاحب الحمار بعد موته الحقيقي. وهذا وجه قريب في تأويل هذا الاخبار، على أنه لا يرجع بأخبار آحاد لا توجب علما عما دلت العقول عليه، وساق الاعتبار الصحيح إليه، وعضده الاخبار المتواترة التي قدمناها، بل الواجب التوقف في هذه والتمسك بما هو معلوم، وإنما تأولناها بعد تسليم صحتها على ما يفعل في نظائرها ويعارض هذه الاخبار ما ينافيها.Comment: These traditions and the like have to be interpreted on the grounds that “his name will die” and many people and not all will believe that “his bones have decayed,” and then Allah will raise him as He raised the owner of the donkey after his real death. This is the sound interpretation of these narrations. Moreover, singularly narrated traditions, which do not convey certitude, are not trusted with respect to something that is rationally known and reasoning has led to it and is supported by inordinate number of traditions. It is necessary not to rule anything on such an occasion and adherence to what is already known. We interpreted these traditions, while setting aside the disputability of their authenticity, as is done in similar situations. Like as follows-