لان الوجه في هذا الخبر انه إنما نفى القدم والقدمين حتى لا يظن ان ذلك وقت لا يجوز غيره والذي روى ذلك رواه على جهة الافضل يبين ما قلناه
Because the interpretation of this report is that he only negated the one footstep and two footsteps so that it would not be assumed that this is the only permissible time and no other, whereas the one who narrated it did so in the sense of it being the preferable (afdhal) time. What clarifies what we have said is:
