مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ أَبِي وَلَّادٍ الْحَنَّاطِ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ( عليه السلام ) قَالَ سَأَلْتُهُ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ ادَّعَتْ عَلَى زَوْجِهَا أَنَّهُ طَلَّقَهَا تَطْلِيقَةً طَلَاقَ الْعِدَّةِ طَلَاقاً صَحِيحاً يَعْنِي عَلَى طُهْرٍ مِنْ غَيْرِ جِمَاعٍ وَ أَشْهَدَ لَهَا شُهُوداً عَلَى ذَلِكَ ثُمَّ أَنْكَرَ الزَّوْجُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ فَقَالَ إِنْ كَانَ إِنْكَارُهُ الطَّلَاقَ قَبْلَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ فَإِنَّ إِنْكَارَهُ لِلطَّلَاقِ رَجْعَةٌ لَهَا وَ إِنْ كَانَ أَنْكَرَ الطَّلَاقَ بَعْدَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ فَإِنَّ عَلَى الْإِمَامِ أَنْ يُفَرِّقَ بَيْنَهُمَا بَعْدَ شَهَادَةِ الشُّهُودِ بَعْدَ أَنْ يَسْتَحْلِفَ أَنَّ إِنْكَارَهُ لِلطَّلَاقِ بَعْدَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ وَ هُوَ خَاطِبٌ مِنَ الْخُطَّابِ .

1. Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from ibn Mahbub from abu Wallad al-Hannat who has said the following: “I once asked abu ‘Abd Allah, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a woman who claims that her husband has divorced her once in the manner of divorce which requires a waiting period. That it has taken place in the presence of witnesses in a Hayd (menses)-free period and without going to bed, but the husband denies it. He (the Imam) said, Tf his denying is before the expiration of waiting period it is (his Ruju‘) going back to her but if it is after the expiration of waiting period, then it is the task of the Imam to separate them from each other after establishing testimony and after oath. His denying after the expiration of waiting period places him in the position of one of those who may propose marriage with her.’”

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ خَالِدٍ عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ سَعْدٍ عَنِ الْمَرْزُبَانِ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ أَبَا الْحَسَنِ الرِّضَا ( عليه السلام ) عَنْ رَجُلٍ قَالَ لِامْرَأَتِهِ اعْتَدِّي فَقَدْ خَلَّيْتُ سَبِيلَكِ ثُمَّ أَشْهَدَ عَلَى رَجْعَتِهَا بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ بِأَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ غَابَ عَنْهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ يُجَامِعَهَا حَتَّى مَضَتْ لِذَلِكَ أَشْهُرٌ بَعْدَ الْعِدَّةِ أَوْ أَكْثَرُ فَكَيْفَ تَأْمُرُهُ قَالَ إِذَا أَشْهَدَ عَلَى رَجْعَتِهِ فَهِيَ زَوْجَتُهُ .

2. Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Khalid from Sa‘d ibn Sa‘d from al-Marzuban who has said the following: “I once asked al-Rida’, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a man who says to his wife, ‘’1‘tadV (you must commence waiting period); I have opened your way. In few days he arranges witness for his going back to her; then remains absent from her before going to bed with her until months pass from the waiting period or more. What do you command in the case?’ He (the Imam) said, ‘Since he has arranged for witness about his going back to his wife, she is his wife.”’

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي نَجْرَانَ عَنْ عَاصِمِ بْنِ حُمَيْدٍ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ قَيْسٍ عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ ( عليه السلام ) أَنَّهُ قَالَ فِي رَجُلٍ طَلَّقَ امْرَأَتَهُ وَ أَشْهَدَ شَاهِدَيْنِ ثُمَّ أَشْهَدَ عَلَى رَجْعَتِهَا سِرّاً مِنْهَا وَ اسْتَكْتَمَ ذَلِكَ الشُّهُودَ فَلَمْ تَعْلَمِ الْمَرْأَةُ بِالرَّجْعَةِ حَتَّى انْقَضَتْ عِدَّتُهَا قَالَ تَخَيَّرُ الْمَرْأَةُ فَإِنْ شَاءَتْ زَوْجَهَا وَ إِنْ شَاءَتْ غَيْرَ ذَلِكَ وَ إِنْ تَزَوَّجَتْ قَبْلَ أَنْ تَعْلَمَ بِالرَّجْعَةِ الَّتِي أَشْهَدَ عَلَيْهَا زَوْجُهَا فَلَيْسَ لِلَّذِي طَلَّقَهَا عَلَيْهَا سَبِيلٌ وَ زَوْجُهَا الْأَخِيرُ أَحَقُّ بِهَا .

3. Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father from ibn abu Najran from ‘Asem ibn Hamid from Muhammad ibn Qays who has said the following: “About the case of a man, who divorces his wife in the presence of two witnesses, and then arranges for witness about his going back to his wife privately without her knowledge. He asks the witnesses to keep it secret from her so she remains uninformed about his revoking the divorce until her waiting period is complete. Abu Ja‘far, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, has said, ‘She will have the choice to remarry him or someone else. If she marries before learning about the revocation of divorce for which witness was arranged by her husband, then the one who divorced her has no way to her and the other husband is more rightful in the case.’”