295. The reason due to which the slanderer of the compelled woman would be lashed

Back to book

حدثنا محمد بن الحسن رحمه الله قال: حدثنا محمد بن الحسن الصفار رحمه الله عن العباس بن معروف عن علي بن مهزيار عن الحسن بن سعيد عن النضر ابن سويد ومحمد بن خالد عن ابن أبي عمير جميعا عن هشام بن سالم عن سليمان بن خالد قال: سألت أبا عبد الله عليه السلام عن رجل سرق سرقة، فكافر عنها فضرب فجاء بها بعينها، هل يجب عليه القطع؟ قال: نعم، ولكن لو اعترف ولم يجئ بالسرقة لم تقطع يده لانه اعترف على العذاب.


1. Muhammad Bin Al Hassan narrated to us, from Muhammad Bin Al Hassan Al Saffar, from Al Abbas Bin Marouf, from Ali Bin Mahiyar, from Al Hassan Bin Saeed, from Al Nazar Bin Suweyd and Muhammad Bin Khalid, both toghether from Ibn Abu Umeyr, from Hisham Bin Salim, from Suleyman Bin Khalid who said, ‘I asked Abu Abdullah (a.s.) about a man who stole something but he denied it. So he was beaten, so he came up with exactly it (the stolen goods). Is the cutting (of the hands) Obligatory upon him?’ He (a.s.) said: ‘Yes. Had he not come with the stolen goods his hands would not be cut-off because he acknowledged (the theft) upon the punishment’.